Cambridge Audio Azur 840A Quick reference guide

White paper

February 2006

Cambridge Audio 840A Class XD™ integrated amplifier

Matthew Bramble – Technical Director, Cambridge Audio

Douglas Self – Electronic Engineer, Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio made a significant leap forward

with the introduction of the Azur range in 2003 by

pushing the boundaries of what was possible in

the budget audiophile segment of the market.

However, we were also keen to produce a high-end

product range which allowed us to flex our engineering muscles and show what we can do with

fewer constraints. A number of development programmes burgeoned while working on the original

and V2 Azur ranges of which the 840A Class XDTM integrated amplifier was one, part of our new 8-

Series.

A number of ideas came to the fore, including the implementation of full microprocessor control for

all functions, nameable inputs and AV mode, custom install features such as RS232 and outputs

for our own Incognito multi-room system. But above all, the unit had to be a true audiophile product

in that sound quality was paramount.

We decided the 840A should in fact be a pre-amplifier and dual-mono power amplifier all in one

chassis. It should also have a balanced input for the matching CD player (of which more in a

separate white paper), two pairs of very high current output transistors per channel so it could drive

any speaker, a new acoustically damped casework and relay switching for input selection. A

relay/resistor ladder volume control scheme for excellent channel balance and low distortion was

also designed.

White paper

Cambridge Audio prides itself on employing the finest staff and we are lucky enough to have

Douglas Self, the renowned writer, designer and amplifier researcher working in our engineering

team. When Doug joined us he already had the seed of an idea to develop a new amplifier topology

and it wasn’t long before he’d pitched us his ‘brave new idea’ and what was to become the Class

XD™ development programme began. The 840A is the first ever Class XD product and the result of

over two years development work.

This new patent-pending technology is only a part of the 840A but is significant enough to warrant

separate treatment here, this white paper aims to outline Class XD technology in simple terms.

Please bear in mind this paper is by its nature technical in style and does not cover the many other

small circuits and tweaks developed as part of the 840A’s extensive measurement and listening

test programme.

For a more in depth technical description of Class XD, please refer to our UK Patent application

number GB 0505024.0.

Background: The state-of-the-art

The great divide in solid-state amplifier technology has always been between the efficient

but ultimately compromised Class B approach and the beautifully linear but dishearteningly

inefficient Class A.

The basic difference between the two methods being that in Class A the output transistors are

modulated by the audio signal to turn more or less ‘on’ but never actually turn off, in Class B the

output transistors actually at some point turn off as the output is passed from one transistor to

another. It is at the point at which the output moving from one transistor to another (the crossover

point) that a small amount of distortion is created. This ‘crossover distortion’ is inevitable and

although it can be minimized, it can be shown that it cannot be completely eliminated. Class A of

White paper

course avoids this small pitfall (because the transistors are always on) but at the expense of a lot

of heat generation. Managing this heat and power dissipation inevitably means that Class A

designs are much more expensive to implement and often of lower power output so as to minimise

the heat as much as possible.

It is indisputable that Class A power amplifiers have the potential to give the best linearity when

well designed, but they are usually impracticable, in reasonably priced equipment at least.

Alternatively, optimal Class B linearity can of course be very good when well designed and is the

preferred method we and most other amplifier designers use in our core products.

We won’t cover these two design methodologies in more detail here as they are generally well

understood and covered in other sources. It is important that it should not be assumed that in

doing this work we intended to replace the Class B or A approaches, both have very real

advantages at different ends of the market and both can be made to sound wonderful when well

implemented. What we were seeking with the development of Class XD was a way of incorporating

a lot of the advantages and sound quality of Class A at a far lower price level than normal and

without the inefficiency inherent in that method.

Well designed Class B amplifiers can in fact achieve extremely low distortion levels of <0.001%-at 1

kHz [Ref 2]. The Class B approach however, does have its ultimate limitations, as we have said

Class B inherently generates crossover distortion, and inconveniently displays this non-linearity at

the zero-crossing, where it is always in evidence no matter how low the signal amplitude. At one

unique value of quiescent current the distortion produced is a minimum, and this is what

characterises optimal Class B; however at no value can it be made to disappear. It is in fact

inherent in the classical Class B operation of a pair of output transistors.

Fig 1 shows a simulation of an output stage that illustrates the heart of the ‘problem’. The diagram

plots the incremental gain of the output stage against output voltage; in other words the gain for a

very small signal. A complementary-feedback pair (CFP) output stage was used. Both 8 and 4 Ohm

White paper

loads are shown. You can see from the Y-axis that in the 8 Ohm case in particular, the gain

variations are very small, with an inoffensive-looking gain ripple around the zero-crossing at 0V

output. This gain ripple however does generate high-order harmonics that can be poorly linearised

as the negative-feedback factor in any linear amplifier falls with increasing frequency.

The 4 Ohm case shows lower overall gain due to the increased loading, and a drop-off of gain at

each side due to falling transistor beta (current gain); this latter distortion mechanism is however

relatively easy to deal with by the use of negative feedback and other methods, and is not

considered further. The awkward gain perturbations at the crossover point are similar to the 8 Ohm

case, but can be seen to be larger in size.

White paper

Fig 1: The incremental gain of a CFP output stage as output voltage changes. SPICE (Simulation

Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis) for 8 and 4 Ohm loads.

There has always been a desire for a compromise between the efficiency of Class B and the

linearity of Class A and the most obvious way to make one is to turn up the quiescent current of a

Class B stage giving what is called Class AB operation. As this is done, an area of Class A

operation, with both output transistors conducting, is created around the zero-crossing.

In fact as this area widens as the quiescent current increases, until ultimately it encompasses the

entire voltage output range of the amplifier, there is thus an infinite range of positions between the

two extremes of Class B and Class A, and this range of modes of operation is referred to as Class

AB.

Unfortunately, while Class AB would seem to be a perfect compromise between Class A and Class

B operation, it does have some hidden issues.

It can be shown [Ref 1] that if Class AB is used to trade-off between efficiency and linearity, its

performance is certainly superior to B below the AB transition level, operating as it does in this

region in pure Class A. This can have very low THD indeed, at less than 0.0006% up to 10 kHz [Ref

3].

However, once the signal exceeds the limits of the Class A region, the THD worsens and does so

somewhat abruptly due to the gain-changes when the output transistors turn on and off. Linearity is

in fact inferior not only to Class A but also to optimally-biased Class B. This is not always fully

appreciated. The effect is sometimes called "gm-doubling".

Class AB distortion can be made very low by good design, but remains at least twice as high as for

the equivalent Class B situation. The bias control of a Class B amplifier actually does not give a

straightforward trade-off between power dissipation and linearity at all levels; this is often not well

White paper

understood and often catches out the unwary. To demonstrate this, Fig 2 shows THD plotted

against output level for Classes AB and B.

Fig 2: THD vs. level for Class B and Class AB. (0 dB is 30W into 8 Ohms)

So actually it would be much more desirable to have an amplifier that would give Class A

performance up to the transition level, with Class B after that, rather than AB. This would abolish

the AB gain changes that cause the extra distortion. This was the purpose of our Class XD

development program, could it be done?

The Class XD crossover displacement principle

We can see that in Class B it would be better if the crossover region were anywhere else rather

than where it is. If the crossover were displaced away from its zero-crossing position, then the

amplifier output would not traverse it until the output reaches a certain voltage level. Also below

this transition point the performance could be pure Class A; above it the performance normal Class

White paper

This is the basic Class XD principle, and it’s a very simple one, develop a topology that displaces

the crossover point to one side of zero crossing.

The essence of the Crossover Displacement principle is the injection of an extra current, into the

output point of a conventional Class B amplifier. This is shown in Fig 3.

Fig 3: On the left is a conventional Class B output stage, showing drivers and bias voltage source.

At the right the stage has been modified by adding a displacer system that draws current from the

output and sinks it into the negative rail.

For convenience we have called the current-injection subsystem The Displacer. Similarly the upper

transistor is The Source, while the lower is The Sink. The displacement current does not directly

alter the voltage at the output - the output stage inherently has low output impedance, and this is

further lowered by the use of global negative feedback. What it does do is alter the pattern of

current flowing in the output devices. The displacement current in the version shown here is sunk to

V- from the output, rather than sourced from V+, so the crossover region is displaced downward

rather than being pulled upwards. This is arbitrary as the direction of displacement makes no

difference, either could be used.

White paper

The extra current therefore flows through Re1, and the extra voltage drop across it means the

output voltage must go negative before the current through Re1 stops and that in Re2 starts. In

other words, the crossover point when Q3 hands over to Q4 has been moved to a point negative of

the 0V rail; for the rest of this article we refer to this as the “transition point”. For output levels

below transition no crossover distortion is generated. The resulting change in the incremental gain

of the output stage is shown in Fig 4.

The displacer current could of course be constant, or, as we then developed in more sophisticated

implementations could even vary with the signal…

We now have before us the intriguing prospect of a power amplifier with three output devices, which

if nothing else is novel. The operation of the output stage is inherently asymmetrical, and in fact

that is its raison d’être, but this should not cause undue alarm. Circuit symmetry is often touted as

being a pre-requisite for either low distortion or healthy operation in general, but this has no real

basis in fact. A perfectly symmetrical circuit may have no even-order distortion, but it may still have

any amount of odd-order non-linearity, such as a cubic characteristic. Odd-order harmonics are

normally considered more dissonant and often more noticeable and deleterious to perceived sound

quality in listening tests, so circuit symmetry in itself is not a useful goal.

White paper

Fig 4: SPICE simulation of the output stage gain variation with and without a constant 1Amp of

displacement current. The central peak is moved left from 0V to -8V.

Realisation

There are several ways in which a suitable displacement current can be drawn from the main

amplifier output node.

Resistive crossover displacement

The most straightforward way to implement crossover displacement would be to simply connect a

suitable power resistor between the output rail and a supply rail, as shown in Fig 5.

White paper

Fig 5: The concept of resistive crossover displacement. In and the following cases, the crossover

point is displaced positively by sinking a current into the negative rail.

This method suffers from poor efficiency, as the resistance acts as another load on the amplifier

output, effectively in parallel with the normal load. It also threatens ripple-rejection problems as R is

connected directly to a supply rail, which in most cases is unregulated and carrying substantial 100

Hz ripple. A regulated supply to the resistor could be used, but this would be very uneconomic and

even less efficient due to the voltage drop in the regulator. The resistive system is inefficient

because the displacement of the crossover region occurs when the output is negative of ground,

but when the output is positive the resistor is still connected and greater current is drawn from it as

the voltage across it increases. This increasing current is of no use in the displacement process

and simply results in increased power dissipation in the positive output half-cycles.

Other manuals for azur 840A

This manual suits for next models

Other Cambridge Audio Amplifier manuals

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio AZUR 851C User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 540A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio AZUR 840A V2 Administrator guide

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 340A SE User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Integrated Amplifier Azur 740A Administrator guide

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio EDGE W User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio AZUR 550A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 540A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 840E User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio CXR200 ZONE 2 User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 540A V2 User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio C11026 User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Solo User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 840W Administrator guide

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio AZUR 650A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 340A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio EDGE M User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 640A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio AZUR 351A User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio CXA81 User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Alva Duo User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio 851D User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 640P User manual

Cambridge Audio

Cambridge Audio Azur 640A V2 User manual

Popular Amplifier manuals by other brands

ASTRO

ASTRO HVO V40 P operating manual

Marantz

Marantz SUPERSCOPE BLA-545 Service data

NAD

NAD CI980 Quick setup guide

Technics

Technics SE-CH770 Service manual

Harman Kardon

Harman Kardon HK6300 instruction manual

NAD

NAD T975 owner's manual

McIntosh

McIntosh MA6850 Brochure & specs

Electro-Harmonix

Electro-Harmonix ENGLISH MUFF’N manual

Viatron

Viatron Autrix Technical manual

GME

GME GA9800 instruction manual

Atlas

Atlas CP700 Specification sheet

Roland

Roland KC-1000 owner's manual

Pyle

Pyle PFMRA350BW user manual

Advantage

Advantage S-250 manual

IRT Electronics

IRT Electronics DVA-3007 manual

Dimavery

Dimavery BA-100 Series user manual

Sony

Sony XM-S400D operating instructions

Schertler

Schertler ROY X quick guide

Cambridge Audio azur 840A Quick reference guide

Popular Amplifier manuals by other brands